A couple actions I have taken working with an interdisciplinary teamare focusing on shared goals and use Evidence-Based practice. If there are disagreements within the team, you could redirect the conversation to focus on how the decision will impact the patient’s care. If power imbalances are affecting patient care, the clinician may want to leverage their leader to help mediate the situation.

One thing that has helped me is to always remember the main goal of interdisciplinary meetings—open communication and keeping the patient at the center of everything we do. Focusing on patient-centered care ensures that our interventions are aligned with their best interests.

These strategies could be of help: 1. Define Roles and Responsibilities 2. Set Shared Goals and Priorities 3. Foster a Collaborative Environment 4. Acknowledge and address Power Imbalances with the team 5. Establish a process for resolving conflicts in a constructive and respectful manner. 6. Keep the patient's needs and well-being at the forefront of all decision-making. 7. Provide Training and Education 8. Encourage Active Listening 9. Lead by Example 10. Conduct Regular Team Meetings

Flattening the hierarchy is a goal Actions can be : - leader receive constructive feedback in front of the team - leader talking the last in a round discussion ( ++ in high stakes discussions) - developing a culture of speaking up ( technically not psychologically speaking) —> workshop all together - make this action mandatory for the leader to grow in the institution This point can change the environnement by a large factor We just have to implement them now

One thing I’ve found helpful is to have an opened dialog with the team. We all share a common goal which is to focus on the patient. With opened communication it is easier to get everyone’s point of view and come up with the best treatment plan.

To prioritize patient-centered care in an interdisciplinary team with power dynamics, I will foster open communication and ensure that every team member’s input is valued equally, regardless of hierarchy. I will advocate for collaborative decision-making where the patient’s needs and preferences remain the central focus. By encouraging transparency and mutual respect among healthcare professionals, I can help create an environment where diverse expertise contributes to comprehensive, patient-first solutions. Additionally, I will actively listen to patient concerns, involve them in their care plans, and ensure that all decisions align with their best interests rather than being influenced by internal power struggles.

Our interdisciplinary approach is vital, but power imbalances are hindering our collaborative potential. Let's discuss strategies for creating a more equitable and inclusive environment where every voice is heard and valued. I propose a team meeting to brainstorm solutions, including guidelines for participation and inclusive decision-making processes. Let's work together to ensure all co

Trazar una ruta de atención y los momentos en los que las demás áreas interdisciplinarias trabajarán para poder alcanzar los objetivos de forma personalizada en cada paciente. Designar a un medico especialista en la materia que llevará cabo el seguimiento del paciente para evitar que el paciente se pierda en el proceso de atención y la experiencia de atención sea mala.

An example I’ve had to use many times is that during these meetings and possible power struggles, I will always bring up patients rights. Yes, it could be in their best interest but it they also have rights to be aware of not just comfort or best interest. We also should really consider what we are dealing with and make sure it’s not our ego driving us to “win”.